<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image resampling for LCD screens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:55:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gidden</title>
		<link>http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/comment-page-1/#comment-43124</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gidden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/#comment-43124</guid>
		<description>Rodrigo: well done! That&#039;s an excellent approach!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodrigo: well done! That's an excellent approach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodrigo Cunha</title>
		<link>http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/comment-page-1/#comment-43112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodrigo Cunha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/#comment-43112</guid>
		<description>Hi!

I just reinvented this... in ImageMagick, using only already defined operations.

If you want the command to do it, check my forum post:

http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=22&amp;t=19120

The thing is, it&#039;s very easy to do already. No need for any new algorithm, just use normal image operations like resampling and matrices.

I&#039;m sure this can be done in OpenGL or DirectX rather quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>I just reinvented this... in ImageMagick, using only already defined operations.</p>
<p>If you want the command to do it, check my forum post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=22&#038;t=19120" rel="nofollow">http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=22&#038;t=19120</a></p>
<p>The thing is, it's very easy to do already. No need for any new algorithm, just use normal image operations like resampling and matrices.</p>
<p>I'm sure this can be done in OpenGL or DirectX rather quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobias</title>
		<link>http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/comment-page-1/#comment-27318</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gidden.net/tom/2006/05/29/lcd-resampling/#comment-27318</guid>
		<description>I am an LCD filtering maniac as well. And so I find this completely awesome.
What do the options of lcdresample mean, though? -b does nothing and -n is used in the code for mode 0 but is not in the usage string.

On the whole, I love the results! I found one other script that used Gimp, but gimp has horrible resampling and the filtering was naive. 
In your code vertical lines are fine. I think that in y-direction there could be a bit more antialias:
http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/img/lcdresample.png

[ Imagemagick Mitchell filter for comparison:
http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/img/Mitchell.png ]

Also I don’t understand the code properly. How does this relate to the 5-tap FIR filter that Freetype uses?
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/src/base/ftlcdfil.c
Are you using the same mechanisms? Can I convert the weights that FreeType uses (light_filter and default_filter) to the weights you include?

I find FreeType more smooth in both x and y. Changing the strength -s does not make it much more smooth in the sense that lines become not only sharper (they do!) but also less jaggy.
compare with this image: http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/cairo/displaytext-fir5.png

But your tool is already very useful. Did you submit this upstream? To Imagemagick of to Cairo? I would love to see Cairo support this in it’s renderer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an LCD filtering maniac as well. And so I find this completely awesome.<br />
What do the options of lcdresample mean, though? -b does nothing and -n is used in the code for mode 0 but is not in the usage string.</p>
<p>On the whole, I love the results! I found one other script that used Gimp, but gimp has horrible resampling and the filtering was naive.<br />
In your code vertical lines are fine. I think that in y-direction there could be a bit more antialias:<br />
<a href="http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/img/lcdresample.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/img/lcdresample.png</a></p>
<p>[ Imagemagick Mitchell filter for comparison:<br />
<a href="http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/img/Mitchell.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/img/Mitchell.png</a> ]</p>
<p>Also I don’t understand the code properly. How does this relate to the 5-tap FIR filter that Freetype uses?<br />
<a href="http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/src/base/ftlcdfil.c" rel="nofollow">http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/freetype/freetype2.git/tree/src/base/ftlcdfil.c</a><br />
Are you using the same mechanisms? Can I convert the weights that FreeType uses (light_filter and default_filter) to the weights you include?</p>
<p>I find FreeType more smooth in both x and y. Changing the strength -s does not make it much more smooth in the sense that lines become not only sharper (they do!) but also less jaggy.<br />
compare with this image: <a href="http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/cairo/displaytext-fir5.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.alice-dsl.net/~towolf/cairo/displaytext-fir5.png</a></p>
<p>But your tool is already very useful. Did you submit this upstream? To Imagemagick of to Cairo? I would love to see Cairo support this in it’s renderer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

